Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Arrillaga-Torrens et al
| Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation |
| Rafael Arrillaga-Torrens, Jr., William Torres-Torres, Luis Hernandez-Santana, Nora Lopez-Rodriguez, Conjugal Partnership Hernandez-Lopez, Ricardo Levy-Echeandia, Lourdes Arce-Rivera, Conjugal Partnership Levy-Arce, Antonio Pavia-Bibiloni, Judith Vidal-Gomez, Conjugal Partnership Pavia-Vidal, Pedro Feliciano-Benitez, Placido Gonzalez-Cordova, Juan Gomez-Cuetara, Rocio Gil-Gomez, Conjugal Partnership Gomez-Gil, Diana Lopez-Feliciano, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, ACE Insurance Company and XL Insurance Company |
| 3:2013cv01328 |
| April 26, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
| San Juan Office |
| San Juan |
| Carmen C. Cerezo |
| Banks and Banking |
| 12 U.S.C. ยง 1821 Default of Loan by Promissary Note |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
659
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Denying "Rafael Arrillaga-Torrens' Motion to Reconsider the August 26, 2016 Opinion and Order, or in the Alternative, to Certify the Order for Appeal under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292(B)" (Docket No. 595); "Arrillag a's Motion to Strike the FDIC's Opposition to the Motion for Reconsideration" (Docket No. 614); SBSMN's "Restricted Motion to Enforce and for Contempt" (Docket No. 626); and "Rafael Arrillaga-Torren's Motion to Modify the Court's January 4th Order" (Docket No. 640). Signed by Judge Pedro A. Delgado-Hernandez on 2/27/2017.(LMR)
|
|
Filing
561
OPINION AND ORDER: Denying as moot 54 FDIC-R's "Motion of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation to Strike Certain Defenses Raised by the Director Defendants"; Granting in part and Denying in part 364 FDIC-R's "Motion for Partial Summary Judgment"; Denying 378 "Arrillaga's Motion for Summary Judgment relating to the Statute of Limitations and Causation"; Denying 367 Arrillaga's "Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to the Jocar Loan" (Docket No. 367); Denying 369 Arrillaga's "Motion for Partial Summary Judgment based on the FDIC's Admissions and Representations as to the Acor, Marat, and City Walk Loans"; Denying 354 "FDIC-R's Motion t o Preclude Rafael Arrillaga-Torrens from using Certain Affidavits obtained in Lieu of Depositions"; Denying as moot 507 "Motion to Dismiss Complaint as to Co-defendant Rocio Gil-Gomez de Liano"; Denying 73 "Liberty Mutual Insu rance Company's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings"; Denying 118 "Liberty Mutual Insurance Company's Motion to Strike the FDIC-R's Sur-reply to Liberty's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings"; Denying 122 &quo t;Liberty Mutual Insurance Company's Motion to Strike the Director Defendants' Surreply to Liberty's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings"; Granting 358 "FDIC-R's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment against Liberty Mu tual Insurance Company and ACE Insurance Company"; Granting 365 "XL Specialty Insurance Company's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment"; Noting 404 "Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Eurobank's Opp osition to Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and ACE Insurance Company's Motion for Summary Judgment"; and Denying 487 "Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and ACE Insurance Company's Joint Motion to Strike." For the reasons explained in the Opinion, Arrillaga shall submit the affidavits for in camera inspection not later than September 9, 2016, with a privilege log to facilitate review. Signed by Judge Pedro A. Delgado-Hernandez on 08/26/2016.(LMR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
