Torres-Canales v. USA

Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Jose E. Torres-Canales
Case Number: 3:2013cv01533
Filed: July 8, 2013
Court: Puerto Rico District Court
Office: San Juan Office
County: Guayama
Presiding Judge: Aida M. Delgado-Colon
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28:2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 22, 2015 11 Opinion or Order of the Court REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re: 1 Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) (Criminal Number 01-121) filed by Jose E. Torres-Canales. Objections to R&R due by 05/06/2015. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Bruce J. McGiverin on 04/22/2015. (SME)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Torres-Canales v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Represented By: Nelson J. Perez-Sosa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jose E. Torres-Canales
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.