Marietti v. Santacana et al
Diana Marietti |
Eduardo Santacana, Sheila Gomez and Conjugal Partnership Santacana-Gomez |
3:2014cv01902 |
December 17, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
San Juan Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Francisco A. Besosa |
Camille L. Velez-Rive |
Recovery of Overpayment and Enforcement of Judgment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 98 OPINION and ORDER granting in part and denying in part 83 motion for summary judgment. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Bruce J. McGiverin on March 24, 2017. (McGiverin, Bruce) |
Filing 48 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re 40 Report and Recommendation; re 14 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; and re 27 Motion to Dismiss. The Court ADOPTS IN PART and REJECTS IN PART the magistrate judge's R & R. The Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART defendant's motion to dismiss the amended complaint. Defendants' motion to dismiss the declaratory judgment claim is GRANTED, and plaintiff's declaratory judgment claim is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Defendants' motion to dismiss the remaining claims is DENIED. Defendants' motion to dismiss the original complaint is MOOT. The Court ORDERS plaintiff Marietti to show cause, no later than July 27, 2015, whether the Court has jurisdiction over her claim brought pursuant to Rule 69. Signed by Judge Francisco A. Besosa on 06/26/2015. (brc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.