Gonzalez-Trapaga v. Mayaguez Medical Center Dr. Ramon Emeterio Betances, Inc. et al
| Justo L Gonzalez-Trapaga |
| Mayaguez Medical Center Dr. Ramon Emeterio Betances, Inc., Jaime Maestre-Grau, Ildefonso Vargas-Feliciano, Milton D. Carrero-Quinones, Efrain Flores-De-Hostos and Municipality of Mayaguez |
| 3:2015cv01342 |
| April 2, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
| San Juan Office |
| Mayaguez |
| Daniel R. Dominguez |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
135
ORDER denying 121 Motion to Dismiss. For the aforementioned reasons, the Court hereby DENIES without prejudice Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 121 ) only as to the matters stated in paragraphs a, b and c of this same page which can be subject to a potential dispositive motion request. Consequently, the Court GRANTS the parties 90 days to conduct discovery regarding the pending matters previously listed by the Court. No extensions shall be granted. Consistent with this Order, Discovery cut-off date is 11/13/2017. Dispositive Motions Deadline are due by 12/13/2017. Signed by Judge Daniel R. Dominguez on 8/10/2017. (EA)
|
|
Filing
105
OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part the motions to dismiss at Docket Nos. 13 and 16 . The parties are to file a memorandum on or before 4/20/2016. Signed by Judge Daniel R. Dominguez on 3/30/2016. (MF)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
