Castro-Cruz v. Municipio Autonimo de Caguas et al
| Jesus Castro-Cruz |
| Municipio Autonimo de Caguas, William Miranda-Torres, Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico, OCALARH, Harry O. Vega-Diaz, Companies A-Z, John Doe and Jane Doe |
| 3:2016cv01756 |
| April 18, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
| San Juan Office |
| Juncos |
| Aida M. Delgado-Colon |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
66
OPINION AND ORDER re 21 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Municipio Autonimo de Caguas, William Miranda-Torres. The Court GRANTS Caguas and Miranda's motion for judgment on the pleadings, ECF No. 21. Accordingly, pl aintiff's federal claims of employment discrimination and retaliation due to age and color under ADEA and Title VII, respectively, and for political discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against co-defendants Autonomous Municipality of Cagu as ("Caguas") and its mayor, William Miranda Torres, is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiff's motions requesting an order at ECF Nos. 64, 65 are MOOT. The Clerk of Court is to enter judgment accordingly. Motions terminated: 65 MOTION requesting Order filed by Jesus Castro-Cruz, 64 MOTION requesting Order filed by Jesus Castro-Cruz. Signed by Judge Aida M. Delgado-Colon on 7/25/2019.(wm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
