Perez v. Astrue
Plaintiff: Fermin O Perez, Jr.
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Case Number: 9:2008cv00036
Filed: January 4, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Beaufort Office
County: Charleston
Presiding Judge: Cameron McGowan Currie
Presiding Judge: George C Kosko
Nature of Suit: Social Security: RSI Tax Suits
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 19, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS the final decision of the Commissioner is reversed and the case is remanded to the Commissioner pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) for further action. Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 2/18/09. (bbro, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Perez v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fermin O Perez, Jr.
Represented By: David Anthony Bornhorst
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?