Woodard v. Lane et al
Plaintiff: Susan Woodard
Defendant: Levert Lane and Aldi Incorporation
Case Number: 0:2012cv00446
Filed: February 16, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Rock Hill Office
County: York
Presiding Judge: Cameron McGowan Currie
Presiding Judge: Shiva V Hodges
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 105 ORDER: Pursuant to the amended scheduling order entered on December 11, 2012, dispositive motions were to be filed by no later than March 15, 2013. [Entry #103]. That deadline has now expired. Because the dispositive motions d eadline in this case has passed and no motions were filed, this case is ready for trial. The Clerk is hereby directed to forward the file to the United States District Judge for trial. Judge Magistrate Judge Shiva V Hodges no longer assigned to case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V Hodges on 4/3/2013. (abuc)
November 21, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 99 OPINION and ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION adopting 95 Report and Recommendation, granting 67 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, denying 71 Motion for Summary Judgment, granting 73 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. This matter is again referred to the Magistrate Judge for further pretrial proceedings. Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 11/21/2012. (cbru, )
June 26, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER granting 58 MOTION to Substitute Attorney filed by Aldi Incorporation. Attorney Frederick T Smith,Diana Sarju Kim for Levert Lane added. Attorney Leslie Arlen Cotter, Jr and Jocelyn Thraine Newman terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V Hodges on 6/26/2012. (abuc)
June 25, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER re 58 MOTION to Substitute Attorney filed by Aldi Incorporation. Prior to ruling on the pending motion, the court requires Aldi's intended substitute counsel to file a statement adopting the pro hac vice motions previously submitted and acknowledging the obligations of local counsel in compliance with Local Civil Rules 83.I.04, 83.I.05, and 83.I.06. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V Hodges on 6/25/2012. (abuc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Woodard v. Lane et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Susan Woodard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Levert Lane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aldi Incorporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?