Nautilus Insurance Company v. Crime Prevention Security Patrol LLC et al
| Nautilus Insurance Company |
| Crime Prevention Security Patrol LLC, Stephen Tarsitano, Thomas Tarsitano, Shaniqua T Moore and Sharetta Moore |
| 0:2014cv03167 |
| August 7, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Rock Hill Office |
| XUS, Outside State |
| Joseph F Anderson |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
141
ORDER affirming the decisions 79 99 of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 12/22/2016. (bgoo)
|
|
Filing
99
ORDER denying the 86 motion for an order of protection filed by Nautilus Insurance Company, denying the 88 motion to alter or amend filed by Gill Insurance, LLC and Kristy Dennis, and granting the 88 motion to supplement the record filed by Gill Insurance, LLC, and Kristy Dennis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 6/1/2016. (bgoo)
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER granting 57 Motion to Substitute Party. Crime Prevention Security Patrol LLC, Stephen Tarsitano, Thomas Tarsitano are terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J Gossett on 9/30/2015. (gmil)
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER directing the pro se parties, Stephen Tarsitano and ThomasTarsitano, to keep the Clerk of Court advised, in writing, if your address changes for any reason. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J Gossett on 8/31/2015. (gmil)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
