Robinson v. Hernandez et al
| Phillip Robinson |
| Nurse Hernandez, M Page, E Beaudy and Officer Hulmuth |
| 0:2015cv00364 |
| January 27, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Rock Hill Office |
| Charleston |
| Patrick Michael Duffy |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
ORDER RULING ON 11 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. It is hereby ordered that the Complaint in the above-captioned case be summarily dismissed without prejudice and without issuance and service of process upon the defendants. It is ordered that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted as the order of this Court. Signed by Honorable Patrick Michael Duffy on 03/19/2015. (egra, )
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER directing Clerk not to authorize service and advising plaintiff to notify Clerk in writing of any change of address. Plaintiff has incurred a debt to the U.S.A. in the amount of $350, Motion granted: 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) filed by Phillip Robinson. Motion denied: 4 Motion to Appoint Counsel filed by Phillip Robinson. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J Gossett on 2/18/2015. (gmil) (Main Document 12 replaced on 2/19/2015) (gmil). Modified to correct filing date on 2/19/2015 (gmil).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
