Queen v. Drew
Petitioner: Nicholas Queen
Respondent: Darlene Drew
Case Number: 2:2011cv02573
Filed: September 27, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Charleston Office
County: Marlboro
Presiding Judge: Timothy M Cain
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 8, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER denying 24 Motion for Reconsideration re 21 Order on Report and Recommendations. Signed by Honorable Timothy M Cain on 2/7/12.(hhil, )
January 12, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 22 JUDGMENT : This petition is dismissed without prejudice and without requiring the Respondent to file and Answer or return. The petitioner shall take nothing on his claim filed pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 2241. (hhil, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Queen v. Drew
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Nicholas Queen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Darlene Drew
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?