Hawkins v. College of Charleston

Plaintiff: Shephen M Hawkins
Defendant: College of Charleston
Case Number: 2:2012cv00384
Filed: February 10, 2012
Court: South Carolina District Court
Office: Charleston Office
County: Charleston
Referring Judge: Bruce Howe Hendricks
Presiding Judge: David C Norton
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12117
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 15, 2013 48 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 44 Report and Recommendation.; denying 37 Motion to Dismiss Signed by Honorable David C Norton on 11/15/2013.(cahe, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hawkins v. College of Charleston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shephen M Hawkins
Represented By: Phoebe A Clark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: College of Charleston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.