Halls v. Office of the United States Trustee

Appellant: Richmond L Halls
Appellee: Office of the United States Trustee
Case Number: 2:2012cv02120
Filed: July 27, 2012
Court: South Carolina District Court
Office: Charleston Office
County: Charleston
Presiding Judge: C Weston Houck
Referring Judge: Bristow Marchant
Nature of Suit: Appeal
Cause of Action: 28:0158
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 24, 2013 23 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying 19 Motion "Expungement for Fraudulent Actions"; adopting Report and Recommendations re 21 Report and Recommendation. The Bankruptcy Court's Order of Conversion is affirmed, and Halls' appeal is dismissed. Signed by Honorable C Weston Houck on 1/22/2013.(vdru, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Halls v. Office of the United States Trustee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: Richmond L Halls
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: Office of the United States Trustee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.