vonRosenberg v. Lawrence et al
| Charles G vonRosenberg |
| Mark J Lawrence and John Doe 1-10 |
| 2:2013cv00587 |
| March 5, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Charleston Office |
| Charleston |
| C Weston Houck |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
693
ORDER AND OPINION Plaintiff's Motion to Enforce 686 is granted in part and denied in part and Defendants' Motion to Stay 690 is denied. Please See Order for All Details. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 12/18/2019.(sshe, )
|
|
Filing
668
ORDER AND OPINION The Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the Disassociated Parishes thirty-five motions for summary judgment on all claims. (Dkt. Nos. 556-70; 572 - 579; 581 - 583; 587 - 593; 599 - 600. ) The Motions are GRANTED as to Plaintiffs' claims regarding the Disassociated Parishes parish names. The Motions are otherwise DENIED. Further, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs Motions for Summary Judgment (Dkt. Nos. 584, 595) against the Disassociated Parishes. The Court also GRANTS Plaintiffs LEAVE TO AMEND the Complaints to substitute The Well Ministries d/b/a The Well by the Sea for The Well by the Sea, Myrtle Beach and AMENDS the caption of this case to substitute The Well Ministries d/b/a The Well by the Sea for The Well by the Sea, Myrtle Beach. Finally, the Court hereby issues the following PERMANENT INJUNCTION and ENJOINS the Disassociated Parishes, their officers, agents , servants, employees, associates, subsidiaries and affiliates from using the following marks or any mark confusingly similar: (see footnote 8 in Order) *The Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States; *The Episcopal Church; *The Episcopal Church Welcomes You; *La Iglesia Episcopal, and; *The Episcopal Shield. (see footnote 9 in Order) The Court further enjoins the Disassociated Parishes their officers, agents, servants, employees, associates, subsidiaries and affiliates from using a ny of the following marks or any mark confusingly similar: *Diocese of South Carolina; *The Episcopal Diocese of South Carolina; *The Protestant Episcopal Church in the Diocese of South Carolina; *The Diocesan Seal. (see footnote 10 in Order) AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 9/19/2019.(sshe, )
|
|
Filing
411
ORDER DENYING the Motions to Dismiss (Dkt. Nos. 315 , 316 ) by Christ the King, Waccamaw and The Vestry and Church Wardens of The Episcopal Church ofThe Parish of Prince George Winyah. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 8/23/2018.(sshe, )
|
|
Filing
140
ORDER AND OPINION The Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Bishops vonRosenberg and Adams's motion to amend their complaint, to join parties, and to add claims (Dkt. No. 124 ); The Episcopal Church of the United State s' motion to amend its complaint-in-intervention, to join parties, and to add claims (Dkt. No. 125 ); and The Episcopal Church in South Carolina's motion to intervene (Dkt. No. 126 ). The Court GRANTS Bishop Lawrence's motion to amend his answer to The Episcopal Church of the United States' complaint-in-intervention (Dkt. No. 134 ). AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 4/16/2018.(sshe, )
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER AND OPINION The Court Grants The Episcopal Church's 83 Motion for leave to intervene under Rule 24(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 8/23/2017.(erav, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
