Hobek v. Boeing Company, The
Plaintiff: William H Hobek
Defendant: Boeing Company, The
Case Number: 2:2016cv03840
Filed: December 8, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Charleston Office
County: Charleston
Presiding Judge: Mary Gordon Baker
Presiding Judge: Richard M Gergel
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 20, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER AND OPINION adopting 24 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker; granting 6 Motion to Dismiss. Further details set forth in Order. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 7/19/2017.(ssam, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hobek v. Boeing Company, The
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William H Hobek
Represented By: Bonnie Travaglio Hunt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Boeing Company, The
Represented By: Mary Hughes Cherry
Represented By: Melissa Ashley Fried
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?