Cornelius v. Columbia, City of
| Michael Cornelius |
| Columbia, City of |
| 3:2008cv02508 |
| July 11, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
| Richland |
| Unassigned - MAG-CIV |
| Matthew J Perry |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
159
OPINION AND ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 141 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by Columbia, City of, 147 Report and Recommendations; denying 155 MOTION for Hearing filed by Michael Cornelius, 154 MOTION for Hearing filed by Michael Cornelius. Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 10/27/2010. (cbru, )
|
|
Filing
146
ORDER denying 133 Motion for Recusal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J Gossett on 9/15/2010.(jpet, )
|
|
Filing
136
OPINION AND ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 123 Report and Recommendations, 81 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Columbia, City of: The court grants in part and denies in part the City's motion for summary judgment and gran ts leave to file a second motion for summary judgment addressing the remaining issues under the appropriate elements of Cornelius's prima facie case. ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Magistrate Judge Paige J Gossett. (Summary Judgment Motion due by 4/23/2010) Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 3/26/2010. Motions referred to Paige J Gossett.(cbru, )
|
|
Filing
123
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that the defendant's motion for summary judgment be granted, re 81 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Columbia, City of. Objections to R&R due by 3/15/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J Gossett on 2/24/2010. (jpet, )
|
|
Filing
115
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 60 MOTION to Strike 1 Complaint as to punitive damages, back pay and reinstatement to employment MOTION to Strike 1 Complaint as to punitive damages, back pay and reinstatement to employment, REPORT AN D RECOMMENDATIONS re 60 MOTION to Strike 1 Complaint as to punitive damages, back pay and reinstatement to employment MOTION to Strike 1 Complaint as to punitive damages, back pay and reinstatement to employment filed by Col; adopting Report an d Recommendations re 95 Report and Recommendations; granted as to striking punitive damages all other matters are pending the issuance on the Report and Recommendation on defendant's Motion for summary judgment. Signed by Honorable Matthew J Perry, Jr on 9/28/2009.(ydav, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cornelius v. Columbia, City of | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michael Cornelius | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Columbia, City of | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
