Cogdill v. American General Assurance Company
Plaintiff: Billy Gene Cogdill
Defendant: American General Assurance Company
Case Number: 3:2008cv03466
Filed: October 13, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Insurance Office
County: Lexington
Presiding Judge: Cameron McGowan Currie
Nature of Suit: Both
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1441 Notice of Removal-Insurance Contract

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 8, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 34 OPINION AND ORDER granting 26 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 27 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 10/8/2009.(ssam, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cogdill v. American General Assurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Billy Gene Cogdill
Represented By: John K Koon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: American General Assurance Company
Represented By: William C Wood, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?