Doyle v. South Carolina Democratic Party, The et al
Plaintiff: Brian Ryan B Doyle
Defendant: South Carolina Democratic Party, The, Carol Fowler, Jay Parmley and John Doe
Case Number: 3:2010cv00203
Filed: January 27, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Columbia Office
County: Richland
Presiding Judge: William M Catoe
Presiding Judge: Henry F Floyd
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 28, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 217 ORDER AND OPINION RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION adopting 205 Report and Recommendation, granting 192 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by William Bill Clyburn Signed by Chief Judge Margaret B Seymour on 8/28/2012. (asni, )
March 31, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 133 OPINION AND ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS granting in part denying in part 30 Motion to Dismiss; to the extent that Plaintiff means to assert a Section 1983 claim based on the alleged conduct of State Representa tive Clyburn and unnamed others as it relates to Plaintiff's employment, Plaintiff shall be permitted to go forward on that claim. All of Plaintiff's remaining claims are dismissed. denying 117 Motion to Amend/Correct Complaint re 123 R eport and Recommendations, Magistrate Judge Kevin McDonald added. This matter is recommitted to the Magistrate for further proceedings on Plaintiff's sole remaining claim.. Signed by Honorable Margaret B Seymour on 3/31/2011. Motions referred to Kevin McDonald.(asni, )
April 23, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 92 ORDER denying 29 Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment and adopting the Report and Recommendation 53 of the Magistrate Judge. Further, Plaintiff's objections to the Magistrate Judge's orders are overruled and the Magistrate Judge's decisions are affirmed. Signed by Honorable Henry F Floyd on April 23, 2010.(csam)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Doyle v. South Carolina Democratic Party, The et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brian Ryan B Doyle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: South Carolina Democratic Party, The
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carol Fowler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jay Parmley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?