Catawba Riverkeeper Foundation Inc v. South Carolina Electric and Gas Company
Plaintiff: Catawba Riverkeeper Foundation Inc
Defendant: South Carolina Electric and Gas Company
Case Number: 3:2012cv00124
Filed: January 12, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Columbia Office
County: XUS, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Joseph F Anderson
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 31, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER denying 12 Motion to Dismiss Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 5/31/12.(mflo, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Catawba Riverkeeper Foundation Inc v. South Carolina Electric and Gas Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Catawba Riverkeeper Foundation Inc
Represented By: Frank S Holleman, III
Represented By: J Blanding Holman, IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: South Carolina Electric and Gas Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?