Smith et al v. State of South Carolina State Election Commission, The et al
| Ann Smith, Tommie Reece, John Pettigrew, Bob Shirley and Robert Tinsley |
| State of South Carolina State Election Commission, The and South Carolina, State of |
| 3:2012cv01543 |
| June 11, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Columbia Office |
| Anderson |
| J Michelle Childs |
| Cameron McGowan Currie |
| Clyde H Hamilton |
| Voting |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1973 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
OPINION AND ORDER denying 24 Motion for TRO and dismissing this action with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Clyde H Hamilton, Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie, Honorable J Michelle Childs on 10/3/2012.(cbru, )
|
|
Filing
20
OPINION AND ORDER re 18 Amended Complaint. (Service of Amended Complaint and Motion due by 5:00 p.m. on 9/25/2012, Response to Motion by Defendants due by 9/28/2012). Signed for the court by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 9/24/2012. (ssam, )
|
|
Filing
10
OPINION AND ORDER denying 4 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Ann Smith, Robert Tinsley, John Pettigrew, Tommie Reece, Bob Shirley. Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie, Honorable Clyde H Hamilton, Honorable J Michelle Childs on 6/18/2012. (cbru, ) Modified to edit text on 6/18/2012 (cbru, ).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
