Paul v. South Carolina Department of Transportation et al
| Ronald I Paul |
| Oscar K Rucker, J Charles Ormond, Jr, Michael H Quinn, G L Buckles, Paul D de Holczer, South Carolina Department of Transportation, Macie M Gresham and Natalie J Moore |
| 3:2013cv01852 |
| July 8, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Columbia Office |
| Richland |
| Cameron McGowan Currie |
| Paige J Gossett |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
OPINION and ORDER denying 46 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 46 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 10/22/2014.(cbru, )
|
|
Filing
43
OPINION and ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION adopting 38 Report and Recommendation, dismissing the action without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 10/8/2014. (cbru, )
|
|
Filing
21
OPINION and ORDER denying 19 Motion for Reconsideration ; denying 19 Motion to Amend/Correct. Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 11/19/2013.(cbru, )
|
|
Filing
15
OPINION and ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION adopting 10 Report and Recommendation, dismissing this action without prejudice and without issuance and service of process on Defendants. Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 10/21/2013. (cbru, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
