Armstrong v. Blazin Wings Inc et al
| Amy Armstrong |
| Blazin Wings Inc and Leon Curtis Croft |
| 3:2015cv00610 |
| February 10, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Columbia Office |
| Richland |
| Mary G Lewis |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
97
ORDER DISMISSING CASE dismissing the action with prejudice and with each party to bear its own costs and fees. Signed by Honorable Joseph F. Anderson, Jr. on 04/20/2016. (bshr, )
|
|
Filing
92
Order to Vacate, For the foregoing reasons, the Rubin Order is vacated, the case is restored to the Court's active docket as to defendant Croft, and the entry of judgment for defendant Blazin Wings is vacated until the di sposition of defendant Croft is determined. Vacating 87 entry of Summary Judgment until the disposition of defendant Croft is determined; Vacating 86 Order Dismissing Case(60 Day Settlement Order), and Finding as Moot 89 Bill of Costs submitted by defendant Blazin Wings. Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 3/23/16. (mflo, )
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER REGARDING UPCOMING SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING notifying parties the hearing scheduled to begin at 10:00 a.m. on Tuesday, January 19, will now begin at 10:30 a.m. that same day in the auditorium of the USC Law School at 701 S. Main Street in Columbia. Signed by Honorable Joseph F. Anderson, Jr. on 01/14/2016. (bshr, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
