Hosch v. United Bank Inc et al
Edward John Hosch |
United Bank Inc, R Leon Cooper, Douglas B Ernest, Wade Stephen Melcher, Donald Ward, James R Quesenberry, Sr, James R Quesenberry, Jr, Triple O Construction Inc, John and Jane Does 1-10, John Doe Corporations 1-10 and Other John Doe Entities 1-10 |
4:2009cv01490 |
June 8, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Florence Office |
Horry |
Thomas E Rogers |
Terry L Wooten |
Plaintiff |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 260 ORDER granting 258 Motion for Entry of Deficiency Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Terry L Wooten on 5/23/2013.(mcot, ) |
Filing 169 ORDER re 159 Order. Defendants, Wade Stephen Melcher, John and Jane Does 1-10, John Doe Corporations 1-10, and Other John Doe Entities 1-10 are hereby DISMISSED from this action without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Terry L Wooten on 04/09/2012. (dsto, ) |
Filing 159 ORDER denying 130 Motion to Amend/Correct; granting 135 Motion to Compel. Additionally, as set forth above, both parties are ordered to comply with the directives herein within ten days of the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 02/13/2012.(dsto, ) |
Filing 72 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. It is hereby ORDERED that the Magistrate Judges Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED 67 . For the reasons articulated by the Magistrate Judge, the plaintiffs motion to file an amended complaint is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part 57 . More specifically, the motion to file an amended complaint is denied as to any allegations against defendants Cooper,Ernest, and Quesenberry, Sr., and granted as to any allegations against defendants United Bank and Melcher 57 . The motions to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction filed by defendants Cooper,Ernest, and Quesenberry, Sr. are GRANTED 21 , 26 , 40 . Defendants Cooper, Ernest, and Quesenberry, Sr. are DISMISSED from this action for lack of jurisdictio n. The motion to dismiss filed by defendant United Bank is dismissed as MOOT 36 . The plaintiff is directed to file an Amended Complaint within ten (10) days of the entry of this Order. In addition, the parties are directed to submit a proposed Amended Scheduling Order within ten (10) days of the entry of this Order. Signed by Honorable Terry L Wooten on 08/27/2010. (dsto, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.