Todd v. Federal Express Corporation et al
| Dannetta Todd |
| Federal Express Corporation, FedEx Corporation and FedEx Express |
| 4:2009cv01501 |
| June 8, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Florence Office |
| Horry |
| Thomas E Rogers |
| Terry L Wooten |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Age) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
243
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. # 203 ) is GRANTED as to the plaintiff's claims for (1) age discrimination based on disparate treatment pursuant to the Ag e Discrimination in Employment Act ("ADEA"), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., and S.C. Code Ann. § 1-13-80; (2) gender discrimination pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and S.C. Code 67; 1-13-80; (3) retaliatory discharge pursuant to the ADEA, Title VII, and S.C. Cod Ann. § 1-13-80; (4) defamation; and (5) intentional infliction of emotional distress. The defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. # 203 ) is DENIED as to the plaintiff's claim for sexual harassment based on a hostile work environment pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. 2000e et seq., and S.C. Code Ann. § 1-13-80. Signed by Honorable Terry L Wooten on 9/12/2012. (prou, )
|
|
Filing
228
ORDER: This Court does not find any portion of the March 8, 2012 Order (Doc. # 193 ) or the March 29, 2012 Order (Doc. # 202 ) to be clearly erroneous or contrary to law. Therefore, this Court AFFIRMS the decision of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Honorable Terry L Wooten on 6/11/2012. (mcot, )
|
|
Filing
202
ORDER denying 196 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 3/29/2012.(mcot, )
|
|
Filing
193
ORDER: Plaintiffs' request that the discovery deadline be extended is denied. Counsel for FedEx are to continue to make documents available to Plaintiffs' counsel for review and copying. Plaintiff Todd's request that the expert-disclosure deadline be extended is denied. Plaintiffs must file any timely motion to compel no later than March 16, 2012. FedEx is to file any response to Plaintiffs' motion no later than March 23, 2012. No replies or further br iefing will be permitted or considered. Plaintiffs are advised that any portion of their motion that exceeds the time constraints of the court's Local Rule 37.01 will be denied. The deadline for filing dispositive motions in these cases is exten ded to March 30, 2012. Responses to any dispositive motions are due no later than April 30, 2012. Replies, if necessary, will be due no later than May 7, 2012. The parties and counsel are advised that no further extensions of time regarding the deadlines for briefing the motion to compel outlined above, briefing dispositive motions, or other deadlines will be given. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 3/8/2012. (mcot, )
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: the Court ACCEPTS the Report in part 29 . For the reasons articulated by the Magistrate Judge and stated by the District Court herein, the defendants motion to dismiss, 8 , is GRANTED in part and DENIED i n part. The defendants motion to dismiss is GRANTED as to the plaintiffs fifth cause of action for battery, and the plaintiffs fifth cause of action for battery is hereby DISMISSED. The defendants motion to dismiss is DENIED as to the plaintiffs seventh cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress/outrage. Signed by Honorable Terry L Wooten on 3/29/2010. (mcot, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
