Ham v. Fuentes et al
Plaintiff: Jon Edward Ham and Charles Fuentes
Defendant: Thomas McFadden, Kenny Boone and Florence County Sheriff's Department
Case Number: 4:2015cv00372
Filed: January 27, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Florence Office
County: Florence
Presiding Judge: R Bryan Harwell
Presiding Judge: Kaymani D West
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 2, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER: Defendant's Motion for Attorney's Fees and Related Nontaxable Costs [ECF # 49 ] is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part, only to the extent that Defendant is entitled to its costs associated with litigation. Accordingly, the amount awarded pursuant to this motion based on the filed Bill of Costs [ECF # 48 ] and including the requested, nontaxable costs is $4,198.65. Signed by the Honorable R. Bryan Harwell on 12/2/2016. (hcic, )
July 6, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court adopts and incorporates by reference the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 45 ] of the Magistrate Judge. It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant's motion for summary j udgment [ECF No. 33 ] is GRANTED and that Plaintiffs' federal law claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's remaining state law claims and DISMISSES the state law claims without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable R Bryan Harwell on 7/6/2016. (mcot, )
December 14, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER granting 24 Motion to Quash. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 12/14/2015. (mcot, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ham v. Fuentes et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jon Edward Ham
Represented By: Michael Chase Payne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charles Fuentes
Represented By: Michael Chase Payne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas McFadden
Represented By: J Scott Kozacki
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kenny Boone
Represented By: J Scott Kozacki
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Florence County Sheriff's Department
Represented By: J Scott Kozacki
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?