Ham v. Fuentes et al
Jon Edward Ham and Charles Fuentes |
Thomas McFadden, Kenny Boone and Florence County Sheriff's Department |
4:2015cv00372 |
January 27, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Florence Office |
Florence |
R Bryan Harwell |
Kaymani D West |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 57 ORDER: Defendant's Motion for Attorney's Fees and Related Nontaxable Costs [ECF # 49 ] is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part, only to the extent that Defendant is entitled to its costs associated with litigation. Accordingly, the amount awarded pursuant to this motion based on the filed Bill of Costs [ECF # 48 ] and including the requested, nontaxable costs is $4,198.65. Signed by the Honorable R. Bryan Harwell on 12/2/2016. (hcic, ) |
Filing 46 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court adopts and incorporates by reference the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 45 ] of the Magistrate Judge. It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant's motion for summary j udgment [ECF No. 33 ] is GRANTED and that Plaintiffs' federal law claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's remaining state law claims and DISMISSES the state law claims without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable R Bryan Harwell on 7/6/2016. (mcot, ) |
Filing 29 ORDER granting 24 Motion to Quash. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 12/14/2015. (mcot, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.