Major v. Greenville Housing Authority et al
| Charles R Major, Jr |
| Greenville Housing Authority, Marion Todd and Mike Raymond |
| 6:2012cv00183 |
| January 19, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Greenville Office |
| Greenville |
| Kevin McDonald |
| G Ross Anderson |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
188
ORDER denying 184 Motion for Reconsideration re 180 Order Ruling on Report and Recommendation. Signed by Honorable G Ross Anderson, Jr on 10/23/12.(alew, )
|
|
Filing
180
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION granting 110 Motion for Summary Judgment,filed by Marian Todd, Housing Authority of the City of Greenville, Mike Raymond, adopting 151 Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, all other pending non-dispositive motions in this case are DISMISSED asMOOT. Signed by Honorable G Ross Anderson, Jr on 9/28/12. (alew, )
|
|
Filing
114
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Denying 14 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Charles R Major, Jr; Denying 59 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply, filed by Charles R Major, Jr; and Denying motion to amend the complaint filed by Charles R Major, Jr. 48 Report and Recommendations is adopted in it's entirety. Signed by Honorable G Ross Anderson, Jr on 7/23/2012. (kric, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
