Caraballo Martinez v. Mansukhani
Petitioner: Pedro R Caraballo Martinez
Respondent: Andrew Mansukhani
Case Number: 6:2015cv01331
Filed: March 25, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Greenville Office
County: Hampton
Presiding Judge: J Michelle Childs
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 26, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 12 . The Magistrate Judges Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED, and Petitioners Petition for § 2241 relief is DISMISSED without prejudice. The legal standard for the issuance of a certificate of appealability has not been met. Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 7/26/2017. (kric, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Caraballo Martinez v. Mansukhani
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Pedro R Caraballo Martinez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Andrew Mansukhani
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?