Diaz v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al

Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Rosalyn Cruz Diaz
Case Number: 8:2013cv00705
Filed: March 15, 2013
Court: South Carolina District Court
Office: Anderson/Greenwood Office
County: Anderson
Referring Judge: Jacquelyn D Austin
Presiding Judge: Richard M Gergel
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 5, 2014 26 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION adopting 23 Report and Recommendation as set out. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 8/5/14. (jsmi, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Diaz v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rosalyn Cruz Diaz
Represented By: Alton L Martin, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.