Murray v. Stevenson
Petitioner: Donovan Murray
Respondent: Warden Stevenson
Case Number: 8:2014cv04506
Filed: November 24, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Anderson/Greenwood Office
County: Richland
Presiding Judge: Jacquelyn D Austin
Presiding Judge: Mary G Lewis
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION adopts 33 Report and Recommendation. 15 Respondent's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and Petitioner's Petition be DENIED. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 1/29/2016. (gpre, ) Modified on 1/29/2016 to replace corrected document by clerk (gpre, ).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Murray v. Stevenson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Donovan Murray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Stevenson
Represented By: Donald John Zelenka
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?