Bey v. Mobility
| Brittany Bey, Brittany Thomas, Brittany Nechelle Thomas, Brittany Rawlinson Bey and Brittany Thomas Bey |
| AT&T Mobility and AT & T Mobility |
| 8:2023cv05016 |
| October 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Joseph Dawson |
| Kevin McDonald |
| Negotiable Instrument |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Anderson. (pbri, )
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Brittany Bey. Response to Motion due by 10/20/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.Motions referred to Kevin McDonald.(pbri, )
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against AT&T Mobility, filed by Brittany Bey. Service due by 1/4/2024.(pbri, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/6/2023: #1 Supporting documents as filed; best scan possible) (pbri, ).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
