Dakota Foundry, Inc. v. Tromley Industrial Holdings, Inc.

Defendant: Tromley Industrial Holdings, Inc.
Plaintiff: Dakota Foundry, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2011cv01026
Filed: August 30, 2011
Court: South Dakota District Court
Office: Northern Division Office
County: Day
Presiding Judge: Charles B. Kornmann
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 5, 2012 19 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER AND OPINION denying 9 Motion to Compel. Signed by Charles B. Kornmann on 1/5/12. (SKK)
August 29, 2012 46 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION. Signed by U.S. District Judge Roberto A. Lange on 08/29/2012. (LH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dakota Foundry, Inc. v. Tromley Industrial Holdings, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tromley Industrial Holdings, Inc.
Represented By: Thomas G. Fritz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dakota Foundry, Inc.
Represented By: Nancy J. Turbak Berry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.