First National Bank in Sioux Falls v. First National Bank South Dakota et al
| 4:2006cv04101 |
| June 9, 2006 |
| US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
| Southern Division Office |
| Lawrence L. Piersol |
| Trademark |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
240
ORDER denying 229 Motion to Stay; granting in part and denying in part 234 Motion for relief from Judgment, and alteration or amendment of Judgment. Signed by U. S. District Judge Lawrence L. Piersol on 3/3/11. (SLW)
|
|
Filing
226
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: Costs Signed by U. S. District Judge Lawrence L. Piersol on 10/26/10. (CMS)
|
|
Filing
223
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Plaintiff is ordered to draft proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law in accordance with this Memorandum Opinion and Order. Signed by U. S. District Judge Lawrence L. Piersol on 9/9/10. (SLW)
|
|
Filing
188
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by U. S. District Judge Lawrence L. Piersol on 9/11/09. (JMM)
|
|
Filing
187
Court Trial MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by U. S. District Judge Lawrence L. Piersol on 9/10/09. (SLW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: First National Bank in Sioux Falls v. First National Bank South Dakota et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
