Cottier, et al v. Martin, City of, et al
| 5:2002cv05021 |
| April 3, 2002 |
| US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
| Western Division Office |
| Karen E. Schreier |
| Civil Rights: Voting |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
516
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 501 Motion for Review of Taxation of Costs to the extent costs in the amount of $1,000 will be taxed against Plaintiff Pearl Cottier and in favor of Defendants. Signed by U. S. District Judge Lawrence L. Piersol on 2/7/12. (DJP)
|
|
Filing
493
JUDGMENT vacating 2/9/07 order and dismissing case. Signed by U. S. District Judge Lawrence L. Piersol on 6/8/10. (JMM)
|
|
Filing
483
ORDER granting 482 Motion for release of attorney's fees and expenses; the American Civil Liberties Union shall pay Patrick Duffy $82,607.50, the amount of Mr. Duffy's attorney fees from the amount paid by defendants to the American Civil Liberties Union. Signed by U. S. District Judge Lawrence L. Piersol on 10/6/08. (SKM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cottier, et al v. Martin, City of, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
