Benetti v. United States Marshalls et al
Plaintiff: Michael Benetti and Michael Wiseley
Defendant: United States Marshalls and Pennington County Jail
Case Number: 5:2022cv05038
Filed: April 25, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of South Dakota
Presiding Judge: Karen E Schreier
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 Summons Issued and USMS 285 form as to United States Marshalls. Original summons, AO 85, #6 Order and Complaint #1 delivered via email to the USMS. (Attachments: #1 AO 85)(KLE)
June 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 RECEIPT for Certified Mail as to Attorney General of the United States. (KLE)
June 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Summons Reissued as to United States Marshalls. Original summons, AO 85, Rule 73, 1 Complaint - Prisoner Civil Rights (42:1983), 6 Order for Service delivered via certified mail (SLT)
June 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Mail sent to United States Marshals Service was returned as undeliverable. #9 Summons Issued as to USA - IFP Cases, was returned. (SLT)
June 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 RECEIPT for Certified Mail as to the United States Attorney's Office; Diana Ryan (KLE)
June 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 SUPPLEMENT by Plaintiff Michael Benetti re #1 Complaint - Prisoner Civil Rights (42:1983). (KLE)
June 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Summons Issued as to United States Marshals Service. Original summons, AO 85, Rule 73, #1 Complaint - Prisoner Civil Rights (42:1983), #6 Order for Service delivered via certified mail. Delivered copies of summons(es), A0 85, #1 Complaint - Prisoner Civil Rights (42:1983), #6 Order for Service to U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General via certified mail. (Attachments: #1 Rule 73, #2 AO 85)(KLE)
June 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE of Rule 73 Memo. (Attachments: #1 AO 85)(KLE)
June 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Service LETTER with enclosed Rule 4, Blank summons and USM 285 forms, sample forms along with AO85 and Rule 73 memo sent by Clerk's Office to Michael Benetti. (KLE)
June 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #2 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and 1915A Screening Ordering Service. Signed by U.S. District Judge Karen E. Schreier on 06/08/2022. cc: sent to Michael Benetti and Pennington Co. Jail Financial Dept. via USPS (KLE)
April 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF: The Clerks Office has received your Civil Rights Complaint together with an Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees and Declaration Under Penalty of Perjury and Prisoner Trust Account Report. A new case has been opened. Copy of docket sheet sent to plaintiff. Any further documents or correspondence you send to the Clerks Office concerning your case must include the case number. All documents submitted for filing must also contain an original signature. Submitted documents are electronically scanned for filing and they become the official court record. The quality of the official court record is determined by the quality of the original documents received for filing. Writing should only be on one side of the paper and writing must be dark enough for scanning. All documents must be on 8.5 x 11 inch paper. A request to electronically file documents in your case must be made through the PACER Service Center at www.pacer.uscourts.gov. The plaintiff must keep the Court informed if the plaintiff's address changes. If the Court is not kept informed and multiple items are returned as undelivered, the plaintiff's case may be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. (KLE)
April 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Michael Benetti. (KLE)
April 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 PRISONER Trust Account Report. (KLE)
April 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Michael Benetti. (KLE)
April 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT pursuant to 42:1983 - Prisoner Civil Rights with Jury Demand. (KLE)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Benetti v. United States Marshalls et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Benetti
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Wiseley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Marshalls
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pennington County Jail
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?