Treadway v. California Products Corporation

Plaintiff: John L Treadway
Defendant: California Products Corporation
Case Number: 2:2013cv00120
Filed: April 28, 2013
Court: Tennessee Eastern District Court
Office: Greeneville Office
County: Carter
Presiding Judge: R Leon Jordan
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 19, 2013 17 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM AND OPINION as set forth in following order. Signed by District Judge R Leon Jordan on 11/19/13. (ABF)
January 5, 2015 41 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge R Leon Jordan on 1/5/15. (JBR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Treadway v. California Products Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John L Treadway
Represented By: Charlton R DeVault, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: California Products Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.