Cases 1 - 8 of 8
California Products Corporation v. Brodsky et al
as 1:2013cv11744
Plaintiff:
California Products Corporation
Defendant:
Robert M Brodsky, Jeffrey Low and Plexicoat America, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
California Products Corporation v. Brodsky et al
as 1:2013cv11743
Plaintiff:
California Products Corporation
Defendant:
Robert M Brodsky, Jeffrey Low and Plexicoat America, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Boyajian et al v. California Products Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv11849
Plaintiff:
Ronald S Boyajian , Frank Leone and David Thompson
Defendant:
California Products Corporation, Joseph D DeAngelis, Joseph S Junkin and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Persechini v. A.W.Chesterton Co. et al
as 1:2008cv10889
Plaintiff:
Letizia Persechini
Defendant:
A.W.Chesterton Co., Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Anchor Packing Company Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SAVOY et al v. OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS et al
as 2:2007cv63938
Plaintiff:
EDWARD J. SAVOY and MARY CHRISTINE SAVOY
Defendant:
OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS, OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORP. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
AC&S INC, AC&S INC, AC&S INC and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
EASTERN REFRACTORIES, EASTERN REFRACTORIES, MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
