Nix v. United States of America et al
| Robert Sherman Nix, III |
| United States of America, United States Attorney General and United States P and A |
| 3:2009cv00030 |
| March 25, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Jefferson |
| H Bruce Guyton |
| Thomas W Phillips |
| None |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
5
JUDGMENT on Decision by the Court, entered by the Clerk, re 4 Order on Report and Recommendation dismissing plaintiff's complaint without prejudice. (copy mailed to Mr. Nix) (AYB)
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER on application to proceed without prepayment of fees and REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: ORDER granting 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk is directed to file the complaint without prepayment of costs or fees. It is RECOMM ENDED that the Complaint be DISMISSED under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e) as frivolous, for failure to state a federal claim upon which relief can be granted, but without prejudice to the plaintiff's rights to re-file here or to file claims in State Court. This Complaint lacks any arguable basis for a recovery in Federal Court.Signed by Magistrate Judge C Clifford Shirley on 03/25/2009. Please note that a copy of the Order has been sent to Robert Nix.(KAW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
