Cases 1 - 10 of 12,692
Gorski v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv00159
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Merrick Garland, United States Attorney General and others
Plaintiff:
Gary William Gorski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2024cv00945
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00938
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Lopez Gonzalez De Roman v. Garland
as 24-2136
Petitioner:
SINDY YAQUELIN ROMAN LOPEZ and NELI ORBELINA LOPEZ GONZALEZ DE ROMAN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Hiraldo-Romero v. Garland
as 24-2132
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
RAMON DANIEL HIRALDO-ROMERO
Barrera-Alvarez v. Garland
as 24-2115
Petitioner:
CRISTIAN VALENTIN GALVEZ-BARRERA and BRENDA MAGALY BARRERA-ALVAREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Azad v. Garland
as 24-2122
Petitioner:
MOMINUL HOQUE AZAD, MEHERIN HOQUE, SELINA AKTHER and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Chen v. Garland
as 24-2114
Petitioner:
XIAO WEN CHEN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2024cv00919
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Singh v. Garland
as 24-2087
Petitioner:
PARAMJEET SINGH
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.