Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Flores v. United States Attorney General et al
as 6:2015cv00091
Plaintiff:
Eric Flores
Defendant:
United States Attorney General and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivadeneira v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2015cv00060
Plaintiff:
Felix Guzman Rivadeneira
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security, Department of Immigration Customs Enforcement, United States Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flores v. United States Attorney General et al
as 6:2015cv00032
Plaintiff:
Eric Flores
Defendant:
United States Attorney General and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flores v. United States Attorney General et al
as 4:2012cv00093
Plaintiff:
Eric Flores
Defendant:
United States Attorney General, United States Department of Health and Human Services and Sierra Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sheridan v. Secretary of State
as 9:2008cv00100
Plaintiff:
Deborah Nicholette Sheridan
Defendant:
Secretary of State and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lundahl v. United States Attorney General et al
as 1:2008cv00036
Plaintiff:
Holli Telford Lundahl
Defendant:
United States Attorney General, Commissioner of IRS, Director of the BOP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. United States of America et al
as 9:2008cv00021
Petitioner:
James Dalton Bell
Respondent:
United States of America, Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Burgert v. United States of America et al
as 4:2007cv00023
Plaintiff:
David E. Burgert, Jr.
Defendant:
United States Attorney General, Federal Bureau of Prisons, David Edwardy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
