Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Curry v. Wingfield
as 3:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Freddie Lee Curry
Defendant:
B. Wingfield, Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States Attorney General
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wallace v. United States Attorney General et al
as 3:2019cv00051
Respondent:
United States Marsalls for the Northern District Ciurt of Huntsville, AL, United States Attorney General, The Alabama parole Board Members and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Petitioner:
Andre Lyneal Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Flores v. United States Attorney General
as 3:2015cv00755
Plaintiff:
Eric Flores
Defendant:
United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flores v. United States Attorney General et al
as 4:2015cv00048
Plaintiff:
Eric Flores
Defendant:
United States Attorney General and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Floyd v. The United States et al
as 3:2013cv00455
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Floyd
Defendant:
The United States , United States Attorney General, State of Mississippi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reyes et al v. United States Attorney General et al
as 4:2009cv00183
Plaintiff:
Gay Lynn Reyes and R.A.H.
Defendant:
United States Attorney General, U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Mississippi, Mississippi Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Zamarripa-Torres v. United States Attorney General et al
as 5:2008cv00299
Plaintiff:
Sergio Zamarripa-Torres
Defendant:
United States Attorney General, Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
