Mills v. Barnard et al
Randall Mills |
Weakley E. Barnard, Sharon D. Jenkins, Mark Gwyn, Beth Rhoton, Marshall County and The City of Lewisburg |
1:2014cv00150 |
November 19, 2014 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Columbia Office |
Marshall |
John S. Bryant |
William J. Haynes |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 Violation of Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 92 ORDER: The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and concludes that it should be adopted and approved. Accordingly, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 87 ) is GRANTED and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Thi s Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 6/11/2019. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jm) |
Filing 55 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: The Plaintiff's motion to compel (Doc. 34 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, and Commissioner Hommrich's motion to quash (Doc. 42 ) is DENIED as premature and without prejudice. Subject to the limitations pr ovided herein, the Defendants shall respond to the Plaintiff's request for production within fourteen (14) days from entry of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 8/24/2016. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.