Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Tennessee Riverkeeper, Inc. v. City of Lewisburg, Tennessee
as 1:2022cv00028
Plaintiff:
Tennessee Riverkeeper, Inc.
Defendant:
City of Lewisburg, Tennessee doing business as Lewisburg Water and Wastewater Department
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
James York v. City of Lewisburg, TN, et al
as 22-5130
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JAMES GREGORY YORK
Defendant:
CITY OF LEWISBURG, TN
Defendant / Appellant:
KYLAR GENTRY, Patrolman
Muhammad v. City of Lewisburg, PA et al
as 4:2021cv00284
Defendant:
Claim Adjuster/Sterling Claims Services, Union County Sheriff Department, Chief of Police and others
Plaintiff:
Tariq H Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jennette v. Stallings et al
as 1:2020cv00068
Defendant:
Kendra Burton, Christopher Stallings, Sherrell Summers and others
Plaintiff:
Dominique Jennette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randall Mills v. Weakley Barnard, et al
as 16-6597
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDALL MILLS
Defendant:
ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY WEAKLEY E. BARNARD, MARK GWYN, BETH RHOTON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SHARON D. JENKINS, Tennessee Bureau of Investigation Agent in her individual and official capacities
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mills v. Barnard et al
as 1:2014cv00150
Plaintiff:
Randall Mills
Defendant:
Weakley E. Barnard , Sharon D. Jenkins , Mark Gwyn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
