Penley et al v. NPC International, Inc.
Tiffney Penley and Ashley Lewis |
NPC International, Inc. |
1:2013cv01031 |
January 29, 2013 |
US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
Jackson Office |
McNairy |
J. Daniel Breen |
Edward G. Bryant |
Labor: Fair Standards |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 204 JUDGMENT. Signed by Chief Judge S. Thomas Anderson on 8/17/2017. (Anderson, S. Thomas) (Main Document 204 replaced on 8/17/2017) (Anderson, S. Thomas). |
Filing 179 ORDER WITHDRAWING REFERRAL (D.E. 141 ) & GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATION (D.E. 138 ). Signed by Chief Judge J. Daniel Breen on 12/13/16. (Breen, J.) |
Filing 171 ORDER ADOPTING IN PART THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S ORDER AND GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' REQUESTED ALTERNATE RELIEF. Signed by Chief Judge J. Daniel Breen on 8/22/16. (Breen, J.) |
Filing 170 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' 140 MOTION FOR EQUITABLE TOLLING. Signed by Chief Judge J. Daniel Breen on 6/29/16. (Breen, J.) |
Filing 123 ORDER DENYING 115 MOTION FOR EQUITABLE TOLLING. Signed by Chief Judge J. Daniel Breen on 6/4/15. (Breen, J.) |
Filing 25 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING MOTION AS MOOT for 24 Report and Recommendations, 16 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, filed by NPC International, Inc.. Signed by Judge J. Daniel Breen on 4/11/13. (Breen, J.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.