U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee
Cases 1 - 10 of 27,115
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv02406
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv02407
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv02405
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Henderson v. Lyons Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 2:2025cv02404
Plaintiff:
Milton A. Henderson
Defendant:
Lyons Enterprises, Inc. and Joel Lyons
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Golden, Jr. v. United States of America
as 1:2025cv01096
Petitioner:
Christopher Lee Golden, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
BMO Bank N.A. v. Belland
as 2:2025cv02397
Plaintiff:
BMO Bank N.A.
Defendant:
Gregory Belland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Rieves v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.
as 2:2025cv02399
Plaintiff:
Richard Rieves
Defendant:
American Honda Motor Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Rieves v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.
as 2:2025cv02400
Plaintiff:
Richard Rieves
Defendant:
American Honda Motor Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Anderson et al v. Henderson
as 2:2025cv02403
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Anderson, Brittany Williams and Ka An
Defendant:
Nicholas O Henderson
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Williamson v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2025cv02402
Plaintiff:
Anthony Williamson
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections and Core Civic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
