U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee
Cases 1 - 10 of 27,223
United States of America v. DHL Supply Chain et al
as 2:2025cv02492
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Daniel Scott Ogden
Garnishee:
DHL Supply Chain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
The Stern Cardiovascular Foundation, Inc. v. Goyal
as 1:2025cv01117
Plaintiff:
The Stern Cardiovascular Foundation, Inc.
Defendant:
Lalchand T Goyal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv02491
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv02491
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv02493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv02494
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Reed v. Shadow Creek West Partners et al

as 1:2025cv02123
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Phelps v. Waste Connections of Tennessee, Inc. et al
as 2:2025cv02490
Unknown:
Jamita Swearengen
Plaintiff:
Caroline Phelps
Defendant:
Waste Connections of Tennessee, Inc. and John Riles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Distinct Real Estate USA 2, LP et al v. Wazonek
as 2:2025cv02489
Plaintiff:
Distinct Real Estate USA 2, LP and Distinct Real Estate USA GP 2, Inc.
Defendant:
Phillip Wazonek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Lusk v. CITY OF MEMPHIS et al
as 2:2025cv02486
Plaintiff:
Michael Lusk
Defendant:
CITY OF MEMPHIS, Cortez Dunn and Rashad Ross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.