US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee
Cases 41 - 50 of 25,657
Mason v. Shelby County Criminal Justice Center
as 2:2024cv02240
Petitioner:
Devonte Mason
Respondent:
Shelby County Criminal Justice Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Moore v. Watwood et al
as 1:2024cv01085
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane Moore
Defendant:
Brandon Watwood, Frank Strata, Jon Walton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hegel v. TDOC et al
as 1:2024cv01088
Plaintiff:
James Frederick Hegel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Watwood et al
as 1:2024cv01087
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Wayne Davis
Defendant:
Brandon Watwood, Jon Walton and Frank Strata
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sandlin v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02233
Plaintiff:
Joshua Sandlin
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Curtis v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01084
Plaintiff:
Annette Curtis
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Fleming v. Tipton County Court
as 1:2024cv01083
Petitioner:
Dawun Fleming
Respondent:
Tipton County Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watson v. Golden North Van Lines, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02227
Not Yet Classified:
Jamita Swearengen
Plaintiff:
Robert Watson
Defendant:
Golden North Van Lines, Inc. and Serena Kraft
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
