US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 5,829
Jones v. John Does 1 Through 3 et al
as 1:2024cv01271
Plaintiff:
Mr. Ricky Edward Jones
Defendant:
Hardeman County, Tennessee and John Does 1 Through 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howard v. Jackson City Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv01269
Defendant:
Jackson City Police Department and Unnamed Defendants 1-100
Plaintiff:
William Scott Howard, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03033
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Howard v. Lam et al
as 1:2024cv01266
Defendant:
Danielle Lam, John Does 1-100 and Nashville, Tennessee
Plaintiff:
William Scott Howard, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v Brasher, et al
as 1:2024cv01265
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Theus v. Gibson County et al
as 1:2024cv01263
Plaintiff:
Mr Delvecchio Theus
Defendant:
Sheriff Paul Thomas, Deputies John Does 1 through 5 and Gibson County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robertson v. Shelby County et al
as 2:2024cv03014
Defendant:
Shelby County and Mr. Michael Johnson
Plaintiff:
Mr. Anthony Robertson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
