Woods v. Hardeman County, Tennessee et al
| danita woods |
| Vincent Hunt and Hardeman County, Tennessee |
| 1:2020cv01157 |
| July 19, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| S Thomas Anderson |
| Charmiane G Claxton |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by J. Austin Stokes on behalf of Hardeman County, Tennessee, Vincent Hunt (Stokes, J.) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by William B. Mauldin on behalf of Hardeman County, Tennessee, Vincent Hunt (Mauldin, William) |
| Filing 10 Summons Issued as to Hardeman County, Tennessee, Vincent Hunt. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (Attachments: #1 Hunt - Summons)(mbm) |
Filing 9
ORDER GRANTING #8 MOTION TO PROCEED WITHOUT PAYMENT OF FILING FEE. Signed by Chief Judge S. Thomas Anderson on 7/20/2020. (mbm)
|
| Filing 8 Second MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis proposed order submitted by danita woods. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Application to Proceed without payment)(Craig, Paul) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER DENYING #2 MOTION TO PROCEED WITHOUT PAYMENT OF FILING FEE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Chief Judge S. Thomas Anderson on 7/20/2020. (mbm)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (mbm) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (mbm) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (mbm) |
| Filing 3 Chief Judge S. Thomas Anderson and Magistrate Judge Charmiane G. Claxton added. (mbm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/20/2020: #1 magistrate judge card) (agj). |
| Filing 2 First MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by danita woods. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Application to Proceed without payment)(Craig, Paul) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by danita woods. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Summons to be issued to Hardeman County, #5 Summons to be issued to Hunt)(Craig, Paul) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
