Griffin et al v. Navistar, Inc.
Anthony Griffin and Jackie Griffin |
Navistar, Inc. |
2:2008cv02283 |
May 6, 2008 |
US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
Motor Vehicle Prod. Liability Office |
Shelby |
Tu M. Pham |
Plaintiff |
Diversity |
28:1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 61 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO PLAINTIFFS' DEFECT AND UNREASONABLY DANGEROUS CONDITION CLAIMS. Signed by Chief Judge Jon Phipps McCalla on 7/8/10. (McCalla, Jon) |
Filing 30 ORDER Denying 27 Defendant's Motion to Preclude Plaintiffs from Disclosing Expert Witnesses and Granting Alternative Motion to Amend the Deadline for Defendant to Disclose Expert Witnesses. Plaintiffs shall have until May 15, 2009, to disclose their experts in compliance with Rule 26(a)(2), including providing written reports for any expert who is retained or specially employed to provide expert testimony. Defendant shall have until July 1, 2009 to disclose its experts. Expert depositions shall be completed by August 1, 2009, and dispositive motions shall be filed by no later than September 15, 2009. All other deadlines and provisions contained in the original scheduling order, including the discovery deadline, shall remain the same. The parties will be notified of the trial date by separate order from the court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham on 3/17/09. (Pham, Tu) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.