Daniels et al v. Morgan Asset Management Inc

Defendant: Morgan Asset Management Inc
Plaintiff: C Fred Daniels
Case Number: 2:2013cv02053
Filed: January 28, 2013
Court: Tennessee Western District Court
Office: Memphis Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Referring Judge: Diane K. Vescovo
Presiding Judge: Samuel H. Mays
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities
Cause of Action: 28:1441 - Petition for Removal: Securities Fraud
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Daniels et al v. Morgan Asset Management Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Morgan Asset Management Inc
Represented By: Scott S Brown
Represented By: Todd H Cox
Represented By: Peter S. Fruin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: C Fred Daniels
Represented By: R Carlton Smyly
Represented By: Crawford S McGivaren, Jr
Represented By: R Carlton Smyly
Represented By: Crawford S McGivaren, Jr
Represented By: R Carlton Smyly
Represented By: Crawford S McGivaren, Jr
Represented By: R Carlton Smyly
Represented By: Crawford S McGivaren, Jr
Represented By: R Carlton Smyly
Represented By: Crawford S McGivaren, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.