Jones v. Shelby Group International, Inc. d/b/a MCR Safety and d/b/a Shelby Specialty Gloves
| Nancy Jones |
| Shelby Group International, Inc. d/b/a MCR Safety and d/b/a Shelby Specialty Gloves |
| 2:2013cv02204 |
| April 2, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Memphis Office |
| Shelby |
| Jon Phipps McCalla |
| Diane K. Vescovo |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jones v. Shelby Group International, Inc. d/b/a MCR Safety and d/b/a Shelby Specialty Gloves | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Nancy Jones | |
| Represented By: | Michael L. Russell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Shelby Group International, Inc. d/b/a MCR Safety and d/b/a Shelby Specialty Gloves | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
