Grayson v. The J.M. Smucker Company
| Clayton Grayson |
| The J.M. Smucker Company |
| 2:2014cv02883 |
| November 11, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Memphis Office |
| Shelby |
| Sheryl H Lipman |
| Tu M Pham |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 21, 2015. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Sheryl H. Lipman on 1/21/15. (Lipman, Sheryl) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Clayton Grayson (Crone, Alan) |
Filing 18
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Judge Sheryl H. Lipman on 1/13/15. (Lipman, Sheryl)
|
|
Filing 17
ORDER granting #15 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Judge Sheryl H. Lipman on 12/8/14. (Lipman, Sheryl)
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER granting #14 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Judge Sheryl H. Lipman on 12/8/14. (Lipman, Sheryl)
|
| Filing 15 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Scott E. Brady (Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0651-2026971) by Clayton Grayson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standing from District Court, #2 Exhibit B - Certificate of Good Standing from the LA Supreme Court, #3 Exhibit C - Declaration of Scott E. Brady)(Crone, Alan) |
| Filing 14 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Phillip Bohrer (proposed order submitted) (Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0651-2026958) by Clayton Grayson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standing from District Court, #2 Exhibit B - Certificate of Good Standing from the LA Supreme Court, #3 Exhibit C - Declaration of Phillip Bohrer)(Crone, Alan) |
| Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Clayton Grayson as to The J.M. Smucker Company. (Jones, Christopher) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #10 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Judge Sheryl H. Lipman on 11/25/14. (Lipman, Sheryl)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #9 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Judge Sheryl H. Lipman on 11/25/14. (Lipman, Sheryl)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice proposed Order submitted (Fee paid as part of previous filing) by Clayton Grayson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Wolff, John) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice proposed Order submitted (Fee paid as part of previous filing) by Clayton Grayson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Jones, Christopher) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER finding as moot #6 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Certificate of Good Standing is not a motion); denying #7 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. #7 is a blank form, as well as a certificate of good standing from the highest Court of a state or theDistrict of Columbia, and from a United States District Court. Both certificates are required. Signed by Judge Sheryl H. Lipman on 11/20/14. (Lipman, Sheryl)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice proposed Order submitted (Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0651-2017592) by Clayton Grayson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Wolff, John) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice proposed Order submitted (Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0651-2017549) by Clayton Grayson. (Jones, Christopher) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to The J.M. Smucker Company. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (csf) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (csf) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (csf) |
| Filing 2 Judge Sheryl H. Lipman and Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham added. (csf) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Class Action Complaint against The J.M. Smucker Company (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0651-2011233), filed by Clayton Grayson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Crone, Alan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Grayson v. The J.M. Smucker Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The J.M. Smucker Company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Clayton Grayson | |
| Represented By: | John Powers Wolff |
| Represented By: | Christopher Keith Jones |
| Represented By: | Alan G. Crone |
| Represented By: | Scott E. Brady |
| Represented By: | Philip Bohrer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
